Turn three supplier proposals into one auditable model
Management needs a common basis for comparison. Build the logic in the Your Model sheet: useful generation → gross saving → net saving → simple payback.

Purpose of this stage: convert supplier and case data into comparable financial measures using an auditable spreadsheet structure.
Outcome for this stage: Construct an auditable spreadsheet model that converts operational solar data into comparable Year-1 financial measures.
You will demonstrate this by: calculating useful generation, gross and net Year-1 savings and simple payback; applying relative and absolute references appropriately; formatting outputs consistently; and creating a decision-relevant visual.
Evidence: completed Your Model!B4:D8, one comparison chart and a one-sentence visual-design rationale.
All formulas on this page are identical. Enter them in the same cells and copy them across in the same direction.
Management needs a common basis for comparison. Build the logic in the Your Model sheet: useful generation → gross saving → net saving → simple payback.
Cells: Your Model!B4:D4
System A formula in B4:
Copy B4 across to D4. Relative references should change automatically.
Select Your Model!B5 and enter:
Copy across to D5. The first reference changes B4 → C4 → D4; the tariff stays locked at Case Data!$B$4.
B5 = R231,840; C5 = R287,980; D5 = R321,048.
In Your Model!B6 enter:
Copy across to D6. Format B6:D6 as rand currency.
B6 = R222,840; C6 = R276,980; D6 = R307,048.
In Your Model!B7 enter:
Copy across to D7. Format B7:D7 to two decimal places.
Your answers should be approximately A = 2.92, B = 2.96, C = 3.22 years. If not, check percentage formats, cell references, subtraction of maintenance, and numerator/denominator.
In Your Model!B8 enter:
Copy across to D8. The final argument 1 means the smallest payback receives rank 1.
System A = 1, System B = 2, System C = 3.
Write one sentence: “I chose to show ___ because ___.”